![]() ![]() I will use ISP modem/router in bridge mode as a GPON terminal and leave the routing to the appliance, like I do today. One port will be designated as WAN and the other as LAN. So, the NCA-1510D wins that category followed by the A and B versions. My primary goal is to maximize OpenVPN performance. Trying to determine the trade off in models CPU and port. NCA-1510D C3758, 6x GbE RJ45 w/ 1 Pair of Gen3 Bypass, 8G EMMC Onboard.NCA-1510C C3308, 4x GbE RJ45 w/o Bypass, 8G EMMC Onboard.NCA-1510B C3558, 4x GbE RJ45 w/ 1 Pair of Gen3 Bypass & 2x GbE SFP w/ LED or GbE RJ45 Intel i210 (By SKU), 8G EMMC Onboard.NCA-1510A C3558, 6x GbE RJ45 w/ 1 Pair of Gen3 Bypass, 8G EMMC Onboard.If this is so, why am I seeing new appliances using the C3000 series rather than the C2758? Perhaps to save power? Aaeon's site, which is a Asus partner has some The Lanner NCA-1510 comes in four models: My take away from the benchmark study is that the older Intel Atom C2758 launched in 2013 has better openssl performance when compared to the newer C3338. Netgate is using the C2558 in the SG-4860. Support for QuickAssist is in the works for pfSense but I can't find any firm dates: The C3000 series does not have this feature. The C2758 also offers the Integrated IntelĀ® QuickAssist Technology.This feature provides security and compression acceleration capabilities used to improve performance and efficiency across the data center. What I am seeing from this study is the Openssl performance of the older C2758 appears to be superior when compared to the C3000 series. ![]() I can now see why the Intel Atom D525 was such a poor performer when it came to VPN performance. Interesting metrics when it comes to Openssl performance. When researching the CPUs inside the appliances, I came across this benchmark study. I spent some time yesterday researching desktop network appliances. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |